Steel CBAM Emission Factors: Official vs Industry Benchmarks

The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has fundamentally changed how steel imports into the EU are regulated, requiring importers to report embedded emissions for every shipment. Understanding the differences between official CBAM emission factors and industry benchmarks is crucial for achieving compliance while optimizing costs. This analysis provides comprehensive insights into the various emission factors, their applications, and the compliance implications of choosing between official and industry-specific benchmarks.

This page provides a detailed comparison between official EU CBAM emission factors and industry benchmarks, including calculation methodologies, compliance risks, and strategic optimization approaches for steel importers.

Understanding Emission Factors Under CBAM

An emission factor under CBAM represents the CO₂ equivalent emissions per tonne of imported steel , covering:

• Direct emissions from steel production processes
• Indirect emissions from electricity consumption in production
• System boundaries defined under CBAM Annexes
• Specific calculation methodologies for different steel categories

The fundamental calculation is:

Embedded emissions = Import volume × Emission factor

For CBAM compliance, this calculation must use verified facility-level data or official default factors when facility data is unavailable. The accuracy of this calculation is critical, as errors exceeding 10% can trigger penalties and corrective filings.

Official CBAM Steel Emission Factors

Official values vary by product category (CN code) and production route. These are the default factors for 2025.

These official factors apply only when no verified installation-level data is provided . Importers using default factors must be aware that these are based on average EU production emissions and may not reflect the actual emissions from their suppliers' facilities.

Industry Benchmark Emission Factors

Industry benchmarks represent actual emission factors from various production methods and facilities globally. These often differ significantly from official CBAM defaults due to variations in technology, energy sources, and production efficiency.

Industry benchmarks demonstrate that actual emissions can vary significantly based on production technology, energy sources, and facility efficiency. Modern facilities using renewable energy sources often achieve significantly lower emission factors than the official defaults.

Comparison: Official vs Industry Benchmarks

The comparison between official CBAM factors and industry benchmarks reveals important considerations for importers:

Accuracy and Risk

• Official Factors : Represent average EU production emissions, designed to be conservative to ensure compliance
• Industry Benchmarks : Reflect actual emissions from specific facilities and production methods
• Using official defaults often results in overestimation of emissions, particularly for steel from modern, efficient facilities

Cost Implications

• Higher Emission Factors : Result in more CBAM certificates needed, increasing costs
• Accurate Factors : Allow for precise calculation, optimizing costs and avoiding overpayment
• For a 10,000-tonne shipment of EAF-based rebar, using industry benchmarks (1.0 tCO₂/t) versus official defaults (2.0 tCO₂/t) could reduce CBAM costs by approximately 50%

Compliance Requirements

• Official Factors : Automatically compliant, no additional verification needed
• Industry Benchmarks : Require facility-specific verification and documentation
• CBAM regulations allow facility-specific factors if properly verified, providing a path to more accurate calculations

Availability and Accessibility

• Official Factors : Publicly available and standardized
• Industry Benchmarks : Require access to supplier-specific data or verified databases
• Facility-specific data availability varies significantly by supplier and region

Which Emission Factor Should You Use?

• If you lack verified supplier data : use official CBAM defaults to avoid penalties.
• If you import >5,000 t/year from EAF suppliers: verified benchmarks typically reduce CBAM cost by 20–40%.
• If variance >10%: expect audit scrutiny—documentation is mandatory.

Compliance Risks of Using Default Factors

Using official default factors often results in:

• Overestimated emissions by 15-40% compared to actual facility-specific emissions
• Higher CBAM certificate costs, directly impacting profitability
• Reduced competitiveness compared to importers using verified facility data
• Potential audit exposure if discrepancies with actual emissions are significant

Under CBAM rules, errors exceeding 10% may trigger penalties and corrective filings. However, using conservative official defaults provides protection against underestimation penalties, creating a trade-off between cost optimization and compliance risk.

Importers should evaluate whether the cost of obtaining verified facility-specific data justifies the potential savings from more accurate emission calculations. For large importers or those with modern suppliers, this investment often pays significant dividends.

Optimization Strategies and Best Practices

To optimize CBAM compliance while maintaining accuracy, importers should consider the following strategies:

Short-term Approach

1. For small shipments or suppliers without verified data, use official default factors
2. Implement systematic tracking of all steel imports with proper categorization
3. Begin collecting facility-specific data from key suppliers for future use

Medium-term Approach

1. Negotiate with suppliers to provide verified facility-specific emission data
2. Develop partnerships with suppliers who have modern, low-emission facilities
3. Invest in systems to manage and verify supplier-provided data

Long-term Approach

1. Build a portfolio of suppliers with verified low-emission facilities
2. Utilize industry databases and verification services for benchmarking
3. Advocate for more granular official factors based on production technology

How to Calculate CBAM Emissions for Steel Imports

The calculation follows these steps:

1. Identify steel product category (CN code classification)
2. Determine production route and facility-specific emission factor
3. Verify facility data if using non-default factors
4. Multiply imported net mass by appropriate emission factor
5. Document all calculations and data sources for audit purposes

For a fast estimate using official default factors, use the free CBAM steel emissions calculator below. For more accurate calculations using facility-specific data, our advanced calculator incorporates verified industry benchmarks and facility-specific factors.

Which Emission Factor Should You Use?

• If you lack verified supplier data : use official CBAM defaults to avoid penalties.
• If you import >5,000 t/year from EAF suppliers: verified benchmarks typically reduce CBAM cost by 20–40%.
• If variance >10%: expect audit scrutiny—documentation is mandatory.

CBAM Steel Calculator

Do I need CBAM reporting?

Conclusions and Recommendations

The analysis of official CBAM emission factors versus industry benchmarks reveals significant opportunities for importers to optimize their compliance costs while maintaining regulatory adherence. Key findings include:

Key Findings

• Significant Variations Exist : Industry benchmarks often show 15-50% lower emissions than official defaults, depending on production technology and energy sources
• Technology Matters : Steel produced in modern electric arc furnaces with renewable energy can have 40-50% lower emissions than default factors
• Cost Optimization Potential : For large importers, using verified facility-specific data can significantly reduce CBAM costs
• Risk Management : Official defaults provide compliance protection but may result in overpayment

Strategic Recommendations

• Immediate Actions : Begin collecting facility-specific data from suppliers, especially for large-volume or high-value steel categories
• Supplier Strategy : Prioritize relationships with suppliers operating modern, low-emission facilities powered by renewable energy
• Investment Priorities : Invest in data verification and management systems to support the use of facility-specific factors
• Compliance Approach : Use official defaults for suppliers unable to provide verified data while transitioning others to facility-specific calculations

Future Outlook

As CBAM regulations mature, we expect:

• More granular official factors based on production technology and energy sources
• Improved access to verified facility-specific data through digital platforms
• Greater emphasis on renewable energy and low-emission production methods
• Development of industry-specific benchmarks that bridge official and actual emission levels

Importers who proactively engage with facility-specific data and supplier relationships will be better positioned to optimize costs and maintain competitive advantages as CBAM regulations evolve. The transition from default to verified facility-specific factors represents both a compliance requirement and a significant cost optimization opportunity.

TaxEcoBit provides:

• <10% error calculations using verified facility-specific data
• CBAM-compliant PDF / Excel outputs with proper documentation
• Steel-specific methodologies incorporating industry benchmarks
• Supplier data verification and management tools